❌
Improvements
Thank you for your feedback!
Error! Please contact site administrator!
Send
Sending...
×
  • Community,
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • May 29, 2009 , 10:02am

IMMIGRATION: ‘National Security Threat’ roams free for over decade

IMMIGRATION: ‘National Security Threat’ roams free for over decade

In a free and democratic society we are supposed to be judged by our conduct and not by the company we keep.

But in Canada, our immigration laws provide an important exception.

Mikhail Lennikov studied Japanese at the Far Eastern State University in the former USSR.

Prior to leaving for a trip to Japan in October 1981, Lennikov was recruited by a KGB agent to provide the agency with information on his classmates which might later be used to determine if they would be permitted to travel outside of the USSR. In August 1982, Lennikov accepted a full-time position with the agency which he held until November 1988 when he was finally dismissed after trying repeatedly to leave the agency.

In 1997, Lennikov obtained a Canadian study permit and moved to Vancouver with his family where he studied at the University of British Columbia.

In 1999, Lennikov applied for permanent residence status in Canada. The application was refused by an immigration officer, not for what Lennikov did for the KGB but for the mere fact that he was once employed by the agency. Our immigration laws render a person inadmissible to Canada for merely “being a member of an organization …that engages in espionage”. In other words, the second Lennikov joined the KGB he immediately met this criterion and forever became inadmissible to Canada regardless of how he might later conduct himself.

Accordingly, the officer delivered a report to the Immigration and Refugee Board which then issued a deportation order against Lennikov. The decision was fully upheld by the Federal Court in 2007 which confirmed that mere membership in the KGB is sufficient to satisfy the definition of “national security threat”.

Lennikov’s wife Irina and their 17 year old son Dmitri are being processed for permanent residence in Canada on humanitarian grounds. However, Lennikov’s 10-year bid to stay in Canada is scheduled to come to an awkward end on June 3rd when he is scheduled to be deported to Russia….alone.

There is no question that our immigration laws need to protect Canadians from foreigners who engage, or who might engage, in criminal activity on our soil. Clearly, this would also include people who actually constitute a threat to our national security. However, Lennikov is not being deported because of what he might do here but merely because of a past association. This is notwithstanding the fact that Lennikov left the KGB over 20 years ago and that the agency was disbanded almost 15 years ago.

If Lennikov is to be deported, he should be deported only if he is, in fact, a national security threat to Canadians, and not because he is caught by a grossly over-reaching definition.

If the decision to deport Lennikov is based on national security, why is it that I don’t necessarily think I will feel more “secure” if and when he is gone?

More importantly, if he is truly a national security threat to Canada, as our government contends, why wasn’t he immediately arrested and detained for the past 12 years?

The fact that he was allowed to roam free is more telling about the risk he actually poses to us than the justification our government is putting forth for his removal.

————————————-

Guidy Mamann practices law in Toronto at Mamann, Sandaluk and is certified by the Law Society of Upper Canada as an immigration specialist. Reach him confidentially at 416-862-0000 or at reporter@migrationlaw.com.

Comments (2)

Click here to cancel reply

  • Most Thumbs Up
  • Newest
  • Most commented
  • Recently active
  1. Andrew S, you are phoney, you are not afraid to have Mikail Lennikov as a neighbour but don't feel comfortable to live near him. If ever there was an example of a hypocrite, you would take first prize.
    Andrew S, you are phoney, you are not afraid to have Mikail Lennikov as a neighbour but don't feel comfortable to live near him. If ever there was an example of a hypocrite, you would take first prize.
    Reply
      Thumb up 0 : 0 Thumb down
    ~Wendel Mayer
    15yrs ago
    X
  2. Your confusion caused by the fact that you understand the letter of law and can’t comprehend its spirit. I truly believe that Mr. Lennikov doesn’t represent any security risk. The thing is it’s immoral for the country to accept thousands people who left former USSR because of KGB and ex KGB agent at the same time. To make it even more simple for you, I’d put it this way – we are not afraid to have Mr. Lennikov as a neighbor – we just don’t feel comfortable to live near him.
    Your confusion caused by the fact that you understand the letter of law and can’t comprehend its spirit. I truly believe that Mr. Lennikov doesn’t represent any security risk. The thing is it’s immoral for the country to accept thousands people who left former USSR because of KGB and ex KGB agent at the same time. To make it even more simple for you, I’d put it this way – we are not afraid to have Mr. Lennikov as a neighbor – we just don’t feel comfortable to live near him.
    Reply
      Thumb up 0 : 0 Thumb down
    ~Andrew S
    15yrs ago
    X
  1. Andrew S, you are phoney, you are not afraid to have Mikail Lennikov as a neighbour but don't feel comfortable to live near him. If ever there was an example of a hypocrite, you would take first prize.
    Andrew S, you are phoney, you are not afraid to have Mikail Lennikov as a neighbour but don't feel comfortable to live near him. If ever there was an example of a hypocrite, you would take first prize.
    Reply
      Thumb up 0 : 0 Thumb down
    ~Wendel Mayer
    15yrs ago
    X
  2. Your confusion caused by the fact that you understand the letter of law and can’t comprehend its spirit. I truly believe that Mr. Lennikov doesn’t represent any security risk. The thing is it’s immoral for the country to accept thousands people who left former USSR because of KGB and ex KGB agent at the same time. To make it even more simple for you, I’d put it this way – we are not afraid to have Mr. Lennikov as a neighbor – we just don’t feel comfortable to live near him.
    Your confusion caused by the fact that you understand the letter of law and can’t comprehend its spirit. I truly believe that Mr. Lennikov doesn’t represent any security risk. The thing is it’s immoral for the country to accept thousands people who left former USSR because of KGB and ex KGB agent at the same time. To make it even more simple for you, I’d put it this way – we are not afraid to have Mr. Lennikov as a neighbor – we just don’t feel comfortable to live near him.
    Reply
      Thumb up 0 : 0 Thumb down
    ~Andrew S
    15yrs ago
    X
  1. Andrew S, you are phoney, you are not afraid to have Mikail Lennikov as a neighbour but don't feel comfortable to live near him. If ever there was an example of a hypocrite, you would take first prize.
    Andrew S, you are phoney, you are not afraid to have Mikail Lennikov as a neighbour but don't feel comfortable to live near him. If ever there was an example of a hypocrite, you would take first prize.
    Reply
      Thumb up 0 : 0 Thumb down
    ~Wendel Mayer
    15yrs ago
    X
  2. Your confusion caused by the fact that you understand the letter of law and can’t comprehend its spirit. I truly believe that Mr. Lennikov doesn’t represent any security risk. The thing is it’s immoral for the country to accept thousands people who left former USSR because of KGB and ex KGB agent at the same time. To make it even more simple for you, I’d put it this way – we are not afraid to have Mr. Lennikov as a neighbor – we just don’t feel comfortable to live near him.
    Your confusion caused by the fact that you understand the letter of law and can’t comprehend its spirit. I truly believe that Mr. Lennikov doesn’t represent any security risk. The thing is it’s immoral for the country to accept thousands people who left former USSR because of KGB and ex KGB agent at the same time. To make it even more simple for you, I’d put it this way – we are not afraid to have Mr. Lennikov as a neighbor – we just don’t feel comfortable to live near him.
    Reply
      Thumb up 0 : 0 Thumb down
    ~Andrew S
    15yrs ago
    X
  1. Andrew S, you are phoney, you are not afraid to have Mikail Lennikov as a neighbour but don't feel comfortable to live near him. If ever there was an example of a hypocrite, you would take first prize.
    Andrew S, you are phoney, you are not afraid to have Mikail Lennikov as a neighbour but don't feel comfortable to live near him. If ever there was an example of a hypocrite, you would take first prize.
    Reply
      Thumb up 0 : 0 Thumb down
    ~Wendel Mayer
    15yrs ago
    X
  2. Your confusion caused by the fact that you understand the letter of law and can’t comprehend its spirit. I truly believe that Mr. Lennikov doesn’t represent any security risk. The thing is it’s immoral for the country to accept thousands people who left former USSR because of KGB and ex KGB agent at the same time. To make it even more simple for you, I’d put it this way – we are not afraid to have Mr. Lennikov as a neighbor – we just don’t feel comfortable to live near him.
    Your confusion caused by the fact that you understand the letter of law and can’t comprehend its spirit. I truly believe that Mr. Lennikov doesn’t represent any security risk. The thing is it’s immoral for the country to accept thousands people who left former USSR because of KGB and ex KGB agent at the same time. To make it even more simple for you, I’d put it this way – we are not afraid to have Mr. Lennikov as a neighbor – we just don’t feel comfortable to live near him.
    Reply
      Thumb up 0 : 0 Thumb down
    ~Andrew S
    15yrs ago
    X

Categories

  • An Uncomplicated Mind
  • At Ground Level
  • Community
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Notebook
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Philippines
  • Printed Front Page
  • Round Up
  • An Uncomplicated Mind
  • At Ground Level
  • Community
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Notebook
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Philippines
  • Printed Front Page
  • Round Up
  • An Uncomplicated Mind
  • At Ground Level
  • Community
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Notebook
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Philippines
  • Printed Front Page
  • Round Up
  • An Uncomplicated Mind
  • At Ground Level
  • Community
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Notebook
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Philippines
  • Printed Front Page
  • Round Up
  • Classifieds
  • Events
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Simple Promotion
  • Classifieds
  • Events
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Simple Promotion
  • Classifieds
  • Events
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Simple Promotion
  • Classifieds
  • Events
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Simple Promotion
Based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, The Philippine Reporter (print edition) is a Toronto Filipino newspaper publishing since March 1989. It carries Philippine news and community news and feature stories about Filipinos in Canada and the U.S.
Powered by Software4publishers.com
Please write the reason why you are reporting this page:
Send
Sending...
Please register on Clascal system to message this user
Reset password Return registration form
Back to Login form