❌
Improvements
Thank you for your feedback!
Error! Please contact site administrator!
Send
Sending...
×
  • News & Features
  • April 12, 2013 , 01:40pm

Wynne: ‘Ontario needs a better transit system’

Wynne: ‘Ontario needs a better transit system’

Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne explains her program of government for the province before the Ethnic Press at Queen’s Park

TORONTO–Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne, emphasized the need for investing in transit to ensure Ontario’s success, during her talk before the officers and members of  the National Ethnic Press and Media Council of Canada.

Speaking before a packed room of journalists during the organization’s monthly meeting,  April 8, 2012, at Queen’s Park, Wynne noted that there was a need to solve gridlock, especially in the Greater Toronto Hamilton area – a problem affecting its reputation and productivity.

She said it was the only way businesses and industries in Ontario’s major city can become more productive.    It was also what people wanted, she said: to get to work on time every morning and get home to their families at the end of the day.

Wynne also said that her government knows “we want the best education for our children; the best health care for our loved ones, parents and grandparents, but we also want the infrastructure so we can move around.”

She said we need infrastructure and the conditions for business to thrive, so “people can be more engaged” in doing their day-to-day affairs, like  “the need for convenient transit so people can get to work in reasonable time, so people can get home at the end of the day in reasonable time.

Wynne revealed that  in 1910 there was a plan to devleop a transit system across the GTA, but because of the debate about the cost, it did not push through. She said that  if  that plan had been pursued incrementally every year since 1910, “we would have a transport system that would be the envy around the world.”

“I’m determined that in 50 years, there will be another premier, another woman, and I don’t want that premier to say ‘I wish that we had pursued that plan.’”
“Whatever we do, whatever change that happens, we should be able to find $2 billion a year for transit.”

One journalist asked about her position on the casino in Toronto, she said she  was leaving it to each municipality to decide on whether they wanted a casino or not.

Wynne also talked about immigration-related matters, but referred more detailed responses to Michael Coteau, Ontario’s Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, who was with the Premier.  Asked about the plight of temporary foreign workers, particularly on their  access to immigrant status, Coteau said it is one area they are looking at right now. — M. Astorga-Garcia

Comments (1)

  • Most Thumbs Up
  • Newest
  • Most commented
  • Recently active
  1. Dear M. Goldhawk:I listened with ientrest to your discussion about Toronto's transportation woes this morning. Most of your callers look at City Council to solve the problem of ever increasing congestion on our streets and hope to see a better allocation of funds in order to ease the problem. This is a fine objective. However, powers granted in the Constitution only allows cities limited opportunities to manage their own affairs. In 1867 there were no big cities and the founding fathers put the provinces in charge of urban areas. 143 years later the old formula is still in place, Toronto hands over billions of dollars to the Province and sees very little in return. The world's most successful cities, (most of them in Europe) are city states that are not subservient to higher levels of government. Toronto's fortunes are not goin
    Dear M. Goldhawk:I listened with ientrest to your discussion about Toronto's transportation woes this morning. Most of your callers look at City Council to solve the problem of ever increasing congestion on our streets and hope to see a better allocation of funds in order to ease the problem. This is a fine objective. However, powers granted in the Constitution only allows cities limited opportunities to manage their own affairs. In 1867 there were no big cities and the founding fathers put the provinces in charge of urban areas. 143 years later the old formula is still in place, Toronto hands over billions of dollars to the Province and sees very little in return. The world's most successful cities, (most of them in Europe) are city states that are not subservient to higher levels of government. Toronto's fortunes are not going to improve as long as the Constitution remains unchanged. In 1982 we had a chance but, sadly, no one was concerned with the future of the cities.Keep up your good work,Regards, Tom Denes, P.Eng.
    Reply
      Thumb up 0 : 0 Thumb down
    ~Mohamed
    12yrs ago
    X
  1. Dear M. Goldhawk:I listened with ientrest to your discussion about Toronto's transportation woes this morning. Most of your callers look at City Council to solve the problem of ever increasing congestion on our streets and hope to see a better allocation of funds in order to ease the problem. This is a fine objective. However, powers granted in the Constitution only allows cities limited opportunities to manage their own affairs. In 1867 there were no big cities and the founding fathers put the provinces in charge of urban areas. 143 years later the old formula is still in place, Toronto hands over billions of dollars to the Province and sees very little in return. The world's most successful cities, (most of them in Europe) are city states that are not subservient to higher levels of government. Toronto's fortunes are not goin
    Dear M. Goldhawk:I listened with ientrest to your discussion about Toronto's transportation woes this morning. Most of your callers look at City Council to solve the problem of ever increasing congestion on our streets and hope to see a better allocation of funds in order to ease the problem. This is a fine objective. However, powers granted in the Constitution only allows cities limited opportunities to manage their own affairs. In 1867 there were no big cities and the founding fathers put the provinces in charge of urban areas. 143 years later the old formula is still in place, Toronto hands over billions of dollars to the Province and sees very little in return. The world's most successful cities, (most of them in Europe) are city states that are not subservient to higher levels of government. Toronto's fortunes are not going to improve as long as the Constitution remains unchanged. In 1982 we had a chance but, sadly, no one was concerned with the future of the cities.Keep up your good work,Regards, Tom Denes, P.Eng.
    Reply
      Thumb up 0 : 0 Thumb down
    ~Mohamed
    12yrs ago
    X
  1. Dear M. Goldhawk:I listened with ientrest to your discussion about Toronto's transportation woes this morning. Most of your callers look at City Council to solve the problem of ever increasing congestion on our streets and hope to see a better allocation of funds in order to ease the problem. This is a fine objective. However, powers granted in the Constitution only allows cities limited opportunities to manage their own affairs. In 1867 there were no big cities and the founding fathers put the provinces in charge of urban areas. 143 years later the old formula is still in place, Toronto hands over billions of dollars to the Province and sees very little in return. The world's most successful cities, (most of them in Europe) are city states that are not subservient to higher levels of government. Toronto's fortunes are not goin
    Dear M. Goldhawk:I listened with ientrest to your discussion about Toronto's transportation woes this morning. Most of your callers look at City Council to solve the problem of ever increasing congestion on our streets and hope to see a better allocation of funds in order to ease the problem. This is a fine objective. However, powers granted in the Constitution only allows cities limited opportunities to manage their own affairs. In 1867 there were no big cities and the founding fathers put the provinces in charge of urban areas. 143 years later the old formula is still in place, Toronto hands over billions of dollars to the Province and sees very little in return. The world's most successful cities, (most of them in Europe) are city states that are not subservient to higher levels of government. Toronto's fortunes are not going to improve as long as the Constitution remains unchanged. In 1982 we had a chance but, sadly, no one was concerned with the future of the cities.Keep up your good work,Regards, Tom Denes, P.Eng.
    Reply
      Thumb up 0 : 0 Thumb down
    ~Mohamed
    12yrs ago
    X
  1. Dear M. Goldhawk:I listened with ientrest to your discussion about Toronto's transportation woes this morning. Most of your callers look at City Council to solve the problem of ever increasing congestion on our streets and hope to see a better allocation of funds in order to ease the problem. This is a fine objective. However, powers granted in the Constitution only allows cities limited opportunities to manage their own affairs. In 1867 there were no big cities and the founding fathers put the provinces in charge of urban areas. 143 years later the old formula is still in place, Toronto hands over billions of dollars to the Province and sees very little in return. The world's most successful cities, (most of them in Europe) are city states that are not subservient to higher levels of government. Toronto's fortunes are not goin
    Dear M. Goldhawk:I listened with ientrest to your discussion about Toronto's transportation woes this morning. Most of your callers look at City Council to solve the problem of ever increasing congestion on our streets and hope to see a better allocation of funds in order to ease the problem. This is a fine objective. However, powers granted in the Constitution only allows cities limited opportunities to manage their own affairs. In 1867 there were no big cities and the founding fathers put the provinces in charge of urban areas. 143 years later the old formula is still in place, Toronto hands over billions of dollars to the Province and sees very little in return. The world's most successful cities, (most of them in Europe) are city states that are not subservient to higher levels of government. Toronto's fortunes are not going to improve as long as the Constitution remains unchanged. In 1982 we had a chance but, sadly, no one was concerned with the future of the cities.Keep up your good work,Regards, Tom Denes, P.Eng.
    Reply
      Thumb up 0 : 0 Thumb down
    ~Mohamed
    12yrs ago
    X

Categories

  • An Uncomplicated Mind
  • At Ground Level
  • Community
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Notebook
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Philippines
  • Printed Front Page
  • Round Up
  • An Uncomplicated Mind
  • At Ground Level
  • Community
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Notebook
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Philippines
  • Printed Front Page
  • Round Up
  • An Uncomplicated Mind
  • At Ground Level
  • Community
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Notebook
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Philippines
  • Printed Front Page
  • Round Up
  • An Uncomplicated Mind
  • At Ground Level
  • Community
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Notebook
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Philippines
  • Printed Front Page
  • Round Up
  • Classifieds
  • Events
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Simple Promotion
  • Classifieds
  • Events
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Simple Promotion
  • Classifieds
  • Events
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Simple Promotion
  • Classifieds
  • Events
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Simple Promotion
Based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, The Philippine Reporter (print edition) is a Toronto Filipino newspaper publishing since March 1989. It carries Philippine news and community news and feature stories about Filipinos in Canada and the U.S.
Powered by Software4publishers.com
Please write the reason why you are reporting this page:
Send
Sending...
Please register on Clascal system to message this user
Reset password Return registration form
Back to Login form